Compare credit models

TORQ, Aave V4, Morpho Vault V2, and Maple put capital to work in different ways. Compare who sets the rules, how loans are funded, and when capital can return.

Book Demo
Diagram comparing the funding path in TORQ, Aave V4, Morpho V2, and Maple

Review the TORQ operating model.

TORQ where capital goes interface.

Where capital goes.

Trace capital from each funding vault into its loans, then review the repayments and losses attributable to that vault’s investor positions.

TORQ who sets the rules interface.

Who sets the rules.

Review the named asset manager and assigned roles responsible for vault configuration, capital allocations, and actions within the mandate.

TORQ borrower model interface.

Borrower model.

Review borrower eligibility, supported collateral, and facility terms before assessing the draw limits and funding available to a position.

TORQ how investors exit interface.

How investors exit.

Available cash can fund immediate payouts, while any shortfall enters the redemption queue and remains subject to the vault’s payout limits.

Industry context for credit infrastructure.

$14.82B

Tokenized U.S. Treasuries: distributed value

$8.00B

Tokenized credit: distributed value

2,609

Tokenized credit assets tracked

TORQ check the specific opportunity interface.

Check the specific opportunity.

  • What happens after a loss. Charged to the funding vault
  • Exposure to review. Vault, facility, and capital priority
  • Access rules. Vault participation policy
  • Withdrawal constraint. Cash, queue, and payout limits

How the four models differ.

  • Funding and control.

  • Where capital goes
  • TORQTracked from vault to each loan
  • Aave v4Shared pool across borrowing markets
  • Morpho V2Vault allocates across selected markets
  • MapleManaged pool funds loans
  • Who sets the rules
  • TORQNamed vault manager and assigned roles
  • Aave v4Governance sets market risk limits
  • Morpho V2Curator sets limits. Allocator invests.
  • MaplePool delegate selects and manages loans
  • Borrower model
  • TORQApproved borrower and facility terms
  • Aave v4Borrow against eligible collateral
  • Morpho V2Borrow in selected markets
  • MapleLoans underwritten by pool delegate
  • Exits and losses.

  • How investors exit
  • TORQCash pays now. Shortfall joins queue.
  • Aave v4Withdraw when the pool has spare cash
  • Morpho V2Uses vault or underlying market liquidity
  • MapleRequest withdrawal under pool rules
  • What happens after a loss
  • TORQCharged to the funding vault
  • Aave v4Collateral may be sold. Hub bears bad debt.
  • Morpho V2Underlying market loss reduces vault value
  • MaplePool records default. Collateral may be sold.

These are operating models. Terms, assets, liquidity, and access depend on the specific vault, market, or pool.

In terms of collateral management, tokenisation could enhance the mobility of collateral, simplify collateral access and posting, and reduce reconciliation costs.

Credit guides.

Mandate questions.

Discuss your mandate

When a manager needs vault funding for defined credit facilities and wants loan outcomes attributed to the vault that funded them. Confirm the specific vault's access, capital priority, and exit rules.

Compare a real mandate.

Bring the facility terms, capital structure, and operating responsibilities into one discussion.

Book Demo